EXP, $15 per million, other forms of payment in post.

So what your saying is that according to "b" everyone selling gold or any resources are violating the TOS? Really? Portalarium setup those forums for that exact purpose. So not following your statement.

 

I've posted a question directly to the dev and it remains unanswered for week.

 

Simple, point Berek to this thread. As Mac stated. Their opinion is the one that matters, not yours or mine.

 

I'm not saying it. The terms of Service is stating it. Either they need to update the TOS to reflect the business model or take action to correct the exploits. I don't care either way.

 

Some people have law degrees and understand this stuff some people don't.

 

Some people assume a lot.......

 

PROOF!

I was hoping I'd be awake long enough to see the smoking gun.

 

You can sell whatever you got in the game for money, that isnt exploiting the game for commercial purposes, but when you are doing $/hour, you are exploiting the game for commercial purposes.

 

Who's assuming. I just want the devs to address this and either correct their Terms of Service or correct those in violation.

 

Are y

Are you asking for proof my question has gone unanswered?

 

It was in answer to your understanding law statement. Or did you miss the quote?

 

Actually it's stated that that he charges $15 per million which takes approx 1 hour of time. Could be less could be more. Which , to me, gives the buyer an idea on how long it will take so they can plan accordingly.

 

Are you answering my question to Sara Dreygon about proof or does this pertain to something else? Like I said I don't have a law degree and not as smart as some of you. I just want clarification from the devs. I think we are all entitled to a little transparency. Don't you?

 

@ Sean Silverfoot I see you and Sara Dreygon have a lot more Forum exposure and experience than me so, I am not as familiar with how things work in this realm. I appreciate your input.

 

To me it was clarified long ago when the forums were set up by Portalarium for such purposes. And I believe that they are extremely transparent. *shrugs*

 

No worries, I rarely take anything personally. Hope you enjoy your time in SOTA.

 

Like I said I don't have as much experience on the forums as you do. Maybe you should be less disparaging to those of us trying to learn more about the game in its entirety and be more amiable. I think this would engender a more cooperative and encouraging environment.

 

I am trying to enjoy it but I work two jobs, go to school full time and have a family of five. So, I don't have as much time as some to get into the forums like this. I've most people to include the devs are less than hospitable when fielding questions. As I've said I have a question that has remained unanswered for a week.

 

@Sean Silverfoot Here is the question to which I am referring:

In the Post Mortem R49 unanswered questions, this was how may question was misrepresented:

"Sappersteel76: Will you add some kind of ranking system which will make it way more fun to do PVP and put more meaning to it?
Tedio: Will you be adding a ranking system for pvp to make it meaningful?
Yes
Atos: See above answer to Cypher Black’s question. Lots of things we will be adding over time for PVP"


Below Is my actual question which remains unanswered:
sappersteel76 January 6, 2018 at 5:54 pm

ALCON,

Warding Imbalance:
I respectfully request that the developers please take a look at the warding imbalance as it pertains to PVP combat. For Example: A well developed polearm user with heavy armor can equip Earth warding against a level 116 Earth mage with Earth skills at 120-130 and easily defeat the Earth mage with over half their HP left. Whereas the Earth mage cannot equip physical warding to provide the same protection. Sure the Mage could use slot or few in their deck for defensive stance, fortified defenses, shield of crystal etc.. but these are temporary buffs that take up a potential combat DPS slot, thereby reducing the amount of DPS output required in PVP. Comparing the two is similitude to apples and oranges. This imbalance would require avatars whom are interested in being competitive to reclass/respec into the “warding” melee build to hope for victory and winning the season prize of store credit and other goodies. This essentially pigeon holes avatar builds into this specific class and denies players the path of their choice. Thank you for your time and attention.

Respectfully,
Theraysa Claire
House of Mangar

 

I sent this directly to Berek and Darkstarr