Dismiss Notice
This Section is READ ONLY - All Posts Are Archived

FIX EXCEPTIONAL CHANCE FOR CRAFTED ITEMS

Discussion in 'Release 57 Feedback' started by Elrond, Sep 18, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Elrond

    Elrond Avatar

    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    4,028
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Crafters Town
    @Bzus

    Been meaning to post about this for some time now ... we're getting screwed so badly with exceptional chance for crafted items . Just finished crafting 40 boots and got 5 exceptionals .... always the same thing when i craft gear im lucky if i get 10%- 15% exceptionals even though the tools says 27 % .

    [​IMG]


    Instead of 11 got 5

    [​IMG]


    I DONT WANT TO CRAFT 100 BOOTS TO GET 27% I WANT TO CRAFT 10- 20 or 40 AND GET 27% .

    Made 40 gauntlets also ..screwed again NOT 27% instead of 11 got 7 .

    [​IMG]


    Made 40 LEGS (2 fail ) - out of 38 got 3 exceptional ---- > 3 :mad:

    [​IMG]

    3 of 38 IS NOT 27%

    Thats 1500 constantan ingots and lots of hours smelting copper ingots, smelting constantan ingots ......making constanan sheets ...gone to ****.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2018
    Dhanas, Witcheypoo, Joeziggy and 3 others like this.
  2. mass

    mass Avatar

    Messages:
    1,223
    Likes Received:
    2,513
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My batches are usually smaller, so I always assume I'm not hitting the % success based on low sample size, but it would be nice if every time you crafted 10 things you got your percent chance, which for me would be 2-3 exceptionals instead of 0-1 which is far more common.
     
    Witcheypoo likes this.
  3. Tila Tenderfoot

    Tila Tenderfoot Avatar

    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Festival
    Thank you for posting this, Elrond. I have observed the same with crafted bows (carpentry station) and leather armor (tailoring).
     
    Witcheypoo likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.