6 skull zones asap

Then it's not a valid argument and there is no 'point' to get. Regardless of the actual number, the follow up argument I made will play out the same. A majority of people on my friends list are already consistently in 5 skull areas. While it's not a large enough sample to determine the actual percentage, I would imagine it's much much higher than 3% currently in reality. I can't just make up numbers to support my argument and prove a point. The only thing that proves is that I have a bias that I'm unwilling to compromise on regardless of the actual facts.