I think a person's motivations for wanting to kill non-consenting players in game should be clearly laid out before proposing any sort of compromise. Far from confusing the issue, this lies at the heart of it. If a person can't present an argument that isn't just meant to satisfy their own personal pleasure in attacking those who aren't consenting, then I feel it has no merit to it. This doesn't mean we can't discuss the issue of consent in pvp, and neither does it necessarily mean that trolling will result. In short, if anyone has a compelling compromise for non-consensual pvp then they are free to change my mind. That said, I will say no more on this subject.